|
| |
| |
| DCCT - Diabetes Control and Complications Trial |
| British Journal of Diabetes and Vascular Disease. 2004;4(1) |
| n=1,441 T1D pts enrolled, n=726 within first five yrs of developing diabetes, n=715 within first fifteen yrs |
| Follow-up was min 4 yrs w avg of 6.5 yrs |
| Of 1,430 alive at end of study, 1,422 evaluable outcomes |
| Results show that intensive tx delays onset & slows progression of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic nephropathy & diabetic neuropathy |
| For intensive tx group, 3-fold risk of severe hypoglycaemia, incl 3x risk of coma or seizures, and weight gain. |
| Macrovascular events (cardiac or peripheral vascular) were not significantly reduced. When episodes of both were combined, there was a 41% risk reduction (p=0.06). |
| |
| UKPDS - UK Prospective Diabetes Study |
| n=5,102 newly diagnosed T2D pts, follow-up |
| n=1,138 conventional tx (CT) initially w diet alone, then non-intensive tx |
| n=2,729 intensive tx w sulphonylurea or insulin, on sulphonylurea add metformin/move to insulin tx, on insulin transfer to complex regimens |
| diabetes-related death (MI/sudden death, fatal stroke, peripheral vasc disease, renal disease, hyper/hypoglycemia), p=0.34 |
| MI (cumulative) b/n intensive vs conventional p=0.052 |
| Intensive tx was better than conventional therapy on all endpoints except stroke, where RR = 1.1 and p=0.52 |
| no evidence of deleterious effect on MI, sudden death or diabetes-related death |
| no evidence for more atheroma-related disease |
| metformin in overweight pts compared w conventional tx statistically significantly reduced all-cause mortality by 36% (p=0.011) and MI by 39% (p=0.01) |
| |
| ADOPT - A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial |
| n=4,360 drug-naïve pts w T2D diagnosed w/in past 3 yrs randomized to rosiglitazone, glyburide or metformin, treated for 4-6 yrs |
| edema and weight gain were common adverse events, along with CHF |
| |
| |
| PROactive - Prospective Pioglitazone Clinical Trial in Macrovascular Events |
| n=5.238 T2D w history of macrovascular disease |
| Primary endpoint was combination of 7 different macrovascular events of varying clinical important (what were these?) |
| The primary endpoint was reduced by 10% but was not statistically significant (p=0.095). The principal secondary endpoint of life-threatening events showed a reduced risk of MI, strokes and death by 16% (p=0.027) |
| Lipid profile improved: HDL increased by 9% more than placebo (p<0.001) and reduced TG by 13% more than placebo (p<0.001) |
| Side effects incl weight gain, edema, non-serious hypoglycemia and heart failure. |