ABC
1Main
2Brand NameXarelto, fka BAY 59-7939
3Generic Namerivaroxaban
4MechanismFactor Xa inhibitor, reversible anticoagulant. Inhibits platelet-bound Factor Xa, clot-bound Xa and free Xa.
5PKCmax 1-4 hours, 80% F, 5-13h T1/2, oxazolidinone chemical class. Little dose response, but more bleeding at higher doses.
6AdministrationOral
7EconomicsUS only. Bayer in Europe.
8IndicationStroke and thrombosis prevention.
91.3 million people in the US get a DVT or receive hip/knee replacement.
10IP2020 - DB
11CompetitionPFE/BMY apixaban. BI's Pradaxa (dabigatran). GSK's odiparcil, betrixaban, edoxaban, eribaxaban, LY517717, TAK-442, YM150. In VTE/PE: Lovenox, fondaparinux.
12Pradaxa has very low bioavailability? Schulman et al.
13TimelineWas file in 2009, now file in Q110. Filed 7/08, PDUFA extended. Refiling seems dependent on ROCKET.
1411/4/2011: Approved.
1511/13/2011: ATLAS ACS results.
1612/29/2011: Submits sNDA for ACS.
17PapersOral factor Xa inhibitors for thromboprophylaxis in major orthopedic surgery: a review. Imberti et al.
18Rivaroxaban in orthopedic surgery - a change of paradigm? Schulman et al. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2009.
19SafetyVery clean non-bleed safety profile.
20PISam Schulman, McMaster University.
21Clinical Trials
22Phase III ATLAS ACS 2 n=15526 - Started 11/08 - Published NEJM 2011
238.9% death, MI, stroke versus 10.7% for placebo.
24
25Phase III "ROCKET" - Stroke prevention in A-Fib vs warfarin. N=14,226. Enrollment complete 7/2009. Results November 2010?
2620mg 18 month? dosing. Co-primary of bleeding/stroke events. Event-driven study (405 events).
271.7% event rate versus 2.2% event rate for warfarin, p=0.015.
282.1% event rate versus 2.4% event rate for warfarin for non-inferiority.
2914.9% bleeding versus 14.5% for warfarin, p=0.442.
30
31Phase III "RE-LY" - Stroke prevention in A-Fib: Pradaxa vs warfarin. Pradaxa versus warfarin - n=18,113.
32110mg or 150mg daily vs warfarin. Open-label?
331.69% events per year in warfarin, 1.53% in low-dose, 1.11% in high-dose.
34
35RECORD-3 Phase III - VTE prevention in total knee replacement surgery n=2531 ex-US
36Superior to Lovenox (enoxaparin) and similar safety profile.
37DVT, non-fatal PE, all-cause mortality was 18.9% for enoxaparin vs 9.6% for rivaroxaban, a 49% reduction.
38Bleeding was nearly identical 7 for riva and 6 for Lovenox.
39
40RECORD-1 Phase III - VTE prevention in total hip replacement surgery n=4541 ex-US
413.7% events for Lovenox vs 1.1% for riva. 6 bleeds for riva vs. 2 for Lovenox.
42
43RECORD-2 Phase III - VTE prevention in total hip replacement surgery n=2509 WW
449.3% events for Lovenox vs. 2.0% events for riva. 1 bleed for each group.
45
46RECORD-4 Phase III - VTE prevention in total knee replacement surgery n=3148 WW
47Prevention of VTE following total knee replacement surgery. 6.9% vs 10.1% for Lovenox.
48Major bleeding 0.7% vs 0.3% for Lovenox.
49
50Phase II dose-finding studies ODIXa-knee/hip n=2817 total in 4 studies
51
52Phase II EINSTEIN - Treatment of VTE
53
54Phase III EINSTEIN - Treatment of VTE
55
56Phase III EINSTEIN - Treatment of DVT
57
58Phase III EINSTEIN-Extension n=1107 - Prevention of recurrent DVT/PE.
59
60Phase II ATLAS ACS TIMI 46 n=3000 - presented AHA 2008
6145% RR reduction
62
63
64Phase III MAGELLAN - Prevention of VTE in medically ill patients. N=8000